State V. Delaney

Memorandum Date:         2/5/02 To:         Carolyn Hess Cc:          From:         Rohit Bhasin RE:          state of matter v. Delaney In the case of State v. Delaney there argon some(prenominal) issues that need to be addressed. The First issue is the credibleness of Val Cavarretta. some other is the cause that detective Lowery had in weftax up the so-c al unrivalleded suspect. The only thing he had to go on was the dictation of a drug dealer whose credibility is still in question. The maraudery occurred on September fourteenth and the board was non conducted until September 22nd, how genuine could Mr. Waitkus be that Mr. Delaney was the alleged robber? The undermentioned question is why were the people in the lineup so closely related in physical features? aforesaid(prenominal) race, all within two inches in height and decennary pounds in weight. A nonher issue is how old were the finger prints that the police had on hand of Mr. Delaney and what condition were they kept in. Have they been tampered with? These questions are non asked or answered anywhere. Another disturbing issue is that Mr. Waitkus when asked to pick a person out of a lineup was not sure whether Mr. Delaney was the robber. In the Police Lineup Form Mr. Waitkus states I speculate #4 is probably the person. This raises the issue of if Mr.

Waitkus is not one hundred percent positive why is Mr. Delaney nevertheless universe held in custody. Mr. Waitkus stated that the lighting in the descent was in truth erect and he got a good pure tone at the suspect, but then he withal said tha! t the suspect was wearing a baseball working capital that covered fractional of his face. How could Mr. Waitkus have gotten a good look if the suspects face was half(prenominal) covered? Another intriguing issue is the fact that Mr. Cavarretta stricken a deal with the prosecution... If you want to get a large essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper