Tok Knowing a Friend and Swimmin

TOK 11 summative judgment quarter 2 Jacqueline Blok 21/11/11 Comp atomic number 18 and line of work versed a friend to knowing how to dr avow, knowing a scientific scheme and knowing a historic period. What conclusions round nature of knowing hindquarters you r each(prenominal)? Thinking I knew how to swim I jumped into a pool and nearly dr causeed. The cardinal friend who was always there for me, who I thought I knew, left me without a goodbye. Thinking that a baseless year was a measurement of quantify, until I had a physics class.I though Pearl Harbor was just a movie, until we were learning approximately knowledge base War 2 in humanities. With asking these questions, to be certain in the world we live in to daytime might be a ch on the wholeenge. Knowing a friend would require a bond, which is occasiond by experiences with each otherwise, a perception of the feelings of that friend and thoughts that run in a deeper level. whiz might think he/she knows both(preno minal)body very well, because of a semipermanent close relationship or similar interests or tastes.However no superstar other than himself or herself would understand their own way of thinking, the workings of their own mind, it is impossible to know why certain movements atomic number 18 performed by some unmatchable else. Only glimpses and insights may be picked up of the complexities of the mysterious mind and record of oneself. My best friend dislikes exposing her legs, because she doesnt feel confident enough to portray them.This seems like a reason commensurate excuse, if she is uncomfortable with her body, it would be her choice to pick up it or non, however deeper psychological featureors be involved and countless other reasons which I would not be able to think of nor comprehend. The knowledge of some other person would be mainly created out of oral communication, perception and emotion. A knowers perception of a friends action would be affected by emotions hence the knowledge of a friend entrust be affected too.A perception of a friend may be altered when the emotions of a friend affects their actions in certain situations. Language has complexities too, language heap make an attempt at describing feelings, however this doesnt erect a complete ground of one and another. The best way to go across feelings would be to let one experience anothers events and create their own feelings an example would be the expression you stopt by chance imagine what I shoot been done, Imagine yourself in some one elses shoes.Considering the history of one, would affect their ways of playing upon situations, each humans think and act differently according to personalities, which stimulate been shaped by all sorts of experiences in their own departed. Swimming is an action which requires a structured breathing pattern and a well quantify combination of limb motions, allowing you to travel through water, the important key dustup here that I found through my observations are that knowing how is not the same as knowing of nor is it close to knowing that.Knowing how to swim is rather similar to knowing a friend. Because one cannot possibly learn how to swim by reading instructions, someone could read all the documents and articles available on how to swim, and jump into a pool and drown. For example at one exceptional time I developed liking in parkour I watched all the youtube videos that I could find on how to parkour, read many articles and tips and tricks. So one day I felt I gained enough knowledge about this acrobatic sport and decided to try it out. And what I learnt was that I could not even jump everyplace a simple bench.I am able to read and apply concepts that I have gained through reading, however in this case I was not able to apply the information fast(a) enough of how to parkour. Even though I had a sophisticated tote up of knowledge on how to parkour, I was unable to convert this knowledge and understandin g into reality. According to my research these two actions swimming and parkouring require bodily-kinesthetic intelligence which is the capacity to control to control the movements of a body and skillfully interact with a variety of objects.Scientific theories have been made through observations of the world, creativity and of course imagination. They can be known through reason, language and perception. A scientist can apprise a theory pu blaspheme upon perception and reasoning and justify this theory with grounds that shows how this peculiar(prenominal) phenomenon follows the predicted theory. For example in chemistry we did a organize of experiments on how different metals when heated in a flame would go out a color. A hypothesis was provided and from that I knew that the flames indeed would alter color.I know for a fact that when Copper Chloride is heated it will impart out a green color, I saw this through my own eyes and as the experiment was repeated several times wit h the same results. Seeing out of my own eyes is proof. Through being taught by my teacher means I am relying on a higher(prenominal) authoritys knowledge. Also the lack of a language can prove a theory, for example every one dies, this is a fact because by using deductive reasoning there is no one here to tell us otherwise.The problem with knowing a historical period is that it is in the past and we are in the present, the knowledge of a historical period is transferred from the past into the present through language and documentation. If we have not been informed about these periods, the present day people would never had known it existed. The knowing of a historical period is found upon pass judgment certain events through evidence from the past. It is unfortunate that historians cannot directly test the past whereas a scientific theory and swimming can be tested.This suggests that examination is thus an important factor in determining the nature of knowledge. The withdraw of knowing a historical period can be reassert by looking at pictures or a documentary, technology over the years has improved significantly the knowledge we know today about the past. Unlike a scientific theory here we can rely on perception, observation and interpretations. To know a historical period we moldiness have either been there or rely on a higher authority to inform us. I however ponder on the possibility of the authority being fooled by perception.This is where logic and reasoning comes in to decide whether or not something has happened. If something hadnt happened, then why can we see evidence of the consequences, for example when I visited Cambodia the Angkor Wat temples I saw evidence of historical artifacts of the monks, and until the present monks still live among there. With this I can reason that these temples must have come from somewhere, and it is definitely a sacred place. With this we are knowing that something happened instead of knowing of a friend.By ident ifying and considering the four concepts that were provided we can fold that the main difference in the nature of the four knowledge claims are the way you know them knowing how to and knowing that something is are completely different. A knower will never be able to know a friend than himself or herself, exact feelings and emotions cannot be communicated directly and as little through perception and language. Swimming can solely be learnt through perception, this ability is not able to be transferred linguistically, but must be learnt first hand through training.A historical period in time can be known by a person who has lived through that time and has transferred the knowledge gained through linguistical means, however the knowledge could be misdirect due to perception or the facts of the period are incomplete providing only one side of the story. A scientific theory may be discovered and proven through various tests and observations via perceptions and reason. However communi cation of this particular theory via language does not have the same effect as the perception of it.Emotions can affect perception language cannot transfer hairsplitting meanings and assumptions to generalize from specific points can be found through inception. out-of-pocket to these ways of knowing being limited, complete knowledge is unable to be attained. Different claims requiring different ways of knowing to justify them, they have all have one thing in common their nature they are based on premises that we accept in every day life as being true and therefore deduct that based on these premises, they are equally true. We know something as far as we are willing to accept it into our world.